Blog

Fifth Circuit Holds That Limitations Tolling Statute Means What It Says

Photo of Brian Humphrey

In a brief per curiam opinion on November 22, the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals made what, perhaps, should have been an obvious ruling: that where a Texas limitations tolling statute does not contain an exception, a federal judge cannot simply create one. However, in Clyce v. Butler, the trial judge decided otherwise, and was reversed by the Fifth Circuit.

In Clyce, 13-year-old Chance Clyce suffered serious injuries and a staph infection during a sixteen-day-stay at the Hunt County Juvenile Detention Center. The next year, Chance's parents filed a lawsuit on their own behalf and on behalf of Chance as his "next friends" against Hunt County and several other defendants under the Texas Tort Claims Act and under section 1983 of the Enforcement Act of 1873 for violation of Chance's civil rights. The parents lost this case when the federal court dismissed claims against two defendants without prejudice and granted summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendants.

In 2014, after Chance became an adult, he filed a section 1983 suit in his own right against several defendants for the same incident, including one of the defendants from his parents' suit, and brought some of the same claims his parents brought. The district court dismissed the case, however, on the basis that Chance's claims were barred by the statute of limitations.

Section 1983 allows a person to file suit against anyone who acts under "color of law" and violates the person's federally-protected rights. While it is a federal law, suits under section 1983 are governed by the forum state's statute of limitations for tort claims. Under Texas law, the statute of limitations for most personal injury tort lawsuits is two years from the time the cause of action "accrues," which normally means when the injury happens. However, the law also provides that a person "younger than 18 years of age" is "under a legal disability," and that where a person "is under a legal disability when the cause of action accrues, the time of the disability is not included in a limitations period." This is commonly called the "tolling statute," and effectively means that a person injured as a minor may normally file suit at any time until he turns 20.

The federal judge, however, held that there was an exception when "a next friend, represented by counsel, aggressively prosecutes a minor's claims on his behalf." Essentially, the judge held that because Chance's parents filed suit previously, Chance had already had an opportunity to vindicate his rights and the purpose of the tolling statute was fulfilled. However, this exception appears nowhere in the Texas statute-as the Fifth Circuit noted, the "Texas code itself gives no indication that a next-friend lawsuit affects the tolling provision." The Fifth Circuit held that Texas courts had declined to hold that the tolling statute could be waived, and concluded that "the district court erred by 'fashioning a rule of [its] own making.'" The Fifth Circuit reversed the dismissal of Chance's claims.

If you or someone you know has been injured by the fault of another, contact an attorney at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz by calling 713-222-7211 or toll free at 1-800-870-9584.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories