An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and remote meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Texas Supreme Court: Chapter 95 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code Does Not Protect Property-Owner Agents

In the latest of the Texas Supreme Court's recent string of decisions interpreting Chapter 95 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, the justices found that employees and agents of property owners do not enjoy Chapter 95's protections.

Ineos USA, LLC v. Elmgren involved claims against a petrochemical plant property owner brought by a contractor's employee injured while replacing a valve on a furnace heater. As is common, the plaintiff also sued an individual who supervised the work being performed at the time of the plaintiff's injury. The court found that based upon the plain language of the statute, Chapter 95 does not provide protection to employees and agents of property owners. However, the court also held that property owners remain immune from vicarious liability. Thus, even if the plaintiff proves that the supervisor was negligent, the property owner cannot be held liable for that negligence unless the actual knowledge and control requirements of Chapter 95 are met.

At first glance, this appears to deliver a serious blow to an injured worker's rights to recovery when a property owner's employee, who is acting as the property owner's agent, causes the injury. However, the court clarified that the term "property owner" only includes a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes. The court's decision makes it clear: a property owner's agents, even those responsible for managing the property on the owner's behalf, are not protected as property owners under Chapter 95. As a result, Plaintiffs will, in some circumstances, find that they have improved opportunities for recovery against property-owner agents. For example, unlike the supervisor in Elmgren, many property owner agents are not likely to be judgment proof. Plaintiffs injured in such circumstances will find their common-law negligence claims against those defendants reinvigorated after Elmgren.

If you or a loved one was injured on a worksite while employed as an independent or subcontractor, you may be able to seek recovery from the worksite's property owner. Contact an attorney at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Friend by calling 713-396-3964 or toll free at 1-800-594-4884.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Back to top