Insurance Companies, Special-Interest Money Defeat Patient Protection Initiative in California

Photo of Eric Gerard

Lost in the national political dialogue following last November's elections was a ballot referendum in California that sought to protect patients from poor medical care. The referendum, which sought to roll back the tide of "tort reform" demagoguery in state houses across the country, was buried under an avalanche of seven- and eight-figure campaign contributions from special interest groups and corporate backers intent on preserving their bottom lines at the expense of public health.

Recent studies document that medical malpractice is the third-leading cause of death in America today, behind only heart disease and cancer. Yet for years, conservative politicians and their corporate backers have pedaled the myth that "tort reform" - the imposition of radical damages caps that deprive juries of their role enshrined in the Seventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution - is needed to stop spiraling health care costs and keep doctors from moving elsewhere. In places like California and Texas, that myth has prevailed, leaving patients unprotected and for-profit hospital groups free to cut corners with impunity. See Marshall Allen, How Many Die From Medical Mistakes in U.S. Hospitals?, ProPublica (Sep. 19, 2013, 9:03 a.m.),

By the evidence, however, the false promises of "tort reform" have been proven just that: false. Health care costs have continued to escalate unabated in those states where caps have been imposed, and doctors have neither poured into "tort reform" states nor fled those where the determination of damages has been left where the Founding Fathers intended - with the jury.

In Texas, where corporate-backed special interest groups upended the historical tradition of leaving damages awards to the jury in medical malpractice cases, the cost of healthcare has actually gone up faster than the national average, while the increase in the number of doctors is no better than in states like New York that have retained the Framers' view of the role of the jury. The only discernible effect of the radical "tort reform" movement in Texas has been a severe decline in patients filing suit against negligent health care companies, as the attorneys who represent them on contingency can no longer afford to front the costs that such legal action entails. This has provided a windfall for insurance companies and corporate hospital systems, but malpractice victims are left without viable recourse to the courts. See John Nova Lomax, Is It Time to Reform Tort Reform? Houstonia (Sep. 30, 2014, 11:59 p.m.),

Consumer groups in California appeared to have caught on to the real purpose of the "tort reform" movement - protecting corporate profits - when they launched an initiative called Proposition 46 last year. The measure proposed lifting certain limits on medical malpractice damages, requiring doctors be tested for drugs and alcohol use, and mandating reporting to the California Medical Board of physicians suspected of drug or alcohol impairment or medical negligence. Soon, however, big insurance companies and medical provider corporations mobilized to defeat Proposition 46, deluging the debate with $58.6 million in special-interest money; the less than $11 million that consumer groups and public interest lawyers were able to put together to promote the measure proved no match. Malpractice victims in California, like in Texas, continue to be arbitrarily deprived of their right to have a jury determine their damages as they would in nearly all other kinds of cases. See Melanie Mason, In Malpractice Initiative Battle, Opponents Heavily Outspent Backers, Los Angeles Times (Feb. 2, 1015, 6:35 p.m.),

The lawyers of Abraham Watkins have been fighting for over 65 years to protect victims of all kinds of negligence, including medical malpractice, and get them the help that they deserve. While the Texas "tort reform" movement has made this battle far more difficult in recent years, the firm stands by injured patients seeking justice through our court system. If you or someone you know has been harmed by negligent medical care, contact an attorney at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Friend by calling 713-222-7211 or toll free at 1-800-870-9584.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories