NTSB Claims Plane Crash Partially Caused by Relying Too Much on Automation

According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the fatal crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214 was caused by the pilots mismanaging the descent toward San Francisco's airport and not aborting the landing to try again.

Other factors included the complexities of the Boeing 777's autothrottle, which were inadequately described in the manufacturer's documents, along with inadequate pilot training and monitoring, the board said.

The board agreed to the cause and contributing factors by a series of 4-0 votes. To avoid future crashes. the board agreed to recommendations including enhancing training for the autothrottle and requiring pilots to land flights manually more often to remain familiar with it.

The board also voted to urge Boeing to change the autothrottle so that it would provide a minimum speed regardless of what part of a flight a plane is in. Investigators found that low-speed protection available in other flight modes would have revved the engines 20 seconds before impact, which would have "likely" prevented the accident, the board said.

"Our goal in this investigation is to help prevent similar accidents in the future," said Christopher Hart, acting chairman of NTSB. "In this instance, the flight crew over-relied on automated systems that they did not understand."

The crash July 6, 2013, killed three people and injured 187, out of 307 aboard the flight from Seoul. The plane was flying lower and slower than intended when it slammed into the seawall at the end of the runway, spun around, and burst into flames.

While Asiana acknowledged the pilots were flying too slow and too low, there is a dispute between the airline and Boeing about why that happened.

Asiana cited "inconsistencies" with the autothrottle that led pilots to believe it would maintain the plane's speed after some adjustments in the autopilot, when in fact the engines were idling in "hold" mode. Boeing has maintained that the plane was functioning as expected and "did not contribute to the accident," and that the pilots should have aborted the landing when they realized things were awry and tried again. The hold mode is widely used in Boeing wide-body planes. But board members offered different perspectives on the pilot's confusion dealing with the wakeup feature that was introduced about 18 years in the 777. Robert Sumwalt, a board member who previously was a 24-year airline pilot, said confusion about the autothrottle was widespread in the industry and not well known. He said the pilots were experienced but expected the autothrottle to work differently than it did.

"I personally don't believe this is a case of crew competency," Sumwalt said. "It was not just this pilot who misunderstood. I think this problem is a lot more widespread than we may have thought."

The disputed hold mode for the autothrottle was common among Boeing wide-body planes for decades. Capt. Roger Cox, the investigator who studied operations in the crash, said the Asiana pilot was surprised by the throttle not waking up. "He used the word 'astonished,'" Cox said.

But Cox said the hold mode was displayed on control panel in front of the pilots. And he said the flying pilot should have called out that he was flying manually, but he didn't.

"You have to look at them," Cox said. "There are plenty of cues in front of you telling you what you've done, but you have to look at them." Six people - two passengers and four flight attendants - were ejected from the plane as it broke apart.

The two passengers, who hadn't been wearing seat belts, died. But investigators found they likely would have survived if they had worn their seat belts. "Seat belts save lives and protect people in all modes of transportation," board member Mark Rosekind said.

The third dead passenger was struck by a door that detached when the plane struck the ground.

If you or someone you know have been injured or killed in an airplane accident, contact an attorney at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Friend by calling 713-222-7211 or 1-800-870-9584.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories