Many Hurdles for the Public to Obtain Risk Information

According to a recent article in the Austin American Statesman, Texans who want to learn more about the risks posed by chemical plants in their communities receive their instructions: no photocopying or cellphone pictures of the provided documents, which sketch out the worst-case scenarios at individual facilities and the safety measures company officials have taken. A sign warns those who enter the Environmental Protection Agency's federal reading room, "You are being monitored." The sign is superfluous: an EPA staffer remains in the room for the duration to ensure the strict rules are followed.

Federal law requires companies that keep dangerous chemicals, such as the West Fertilizer facility that exploded last month, killing 14 people, to produce a risk management plan so local residents can know what threats sit in their neighborhoods. When legislators convened last week to hold the first state hearing into the deadly explosion of the West Fertilizer Co. plant, foremost in their minds, they said, was helping Texans learn more about potentially dangerous facilities in their communities. "The intent of this committee is to try to shed light on where these facilities are located and what kind of chemicals we're talking about," said Rep. Joseph Pickett, chairman of the House Homeland Security and Public Safety committee. It turns out that it's not as easy as it sounds.

The West disaster has exposed a system of information sharing that would test the commitment of even the most engaged citizens. Rural Texans have to drive hours to read the risk plans; agencies that are encouraged to collect information sometimes choose not to make it public; and information gathered and reported by the companies themselves may be either incomplete or not useful. The difficulty in accessing even the most basic information about the chemical facilities demonstrates the conflict between informing Americans about the risks in their backyards and the need to keep such information from would-be terrorists and criminals. Those security concerns appear to be winning the tug of war.

As a result, securing the facilities against terrorists has become as high a priority as informing neighbors of the chemical threats in their midst. Compounding the problem is an uneven system of voluntary, decentralized local emergency protection committees that often have scant information about the facilities in their areas.

In theory, the best place to learn what would happen during a worst-case scenario at a local chemical facility is in the risk management plans, maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency and produced specifically for the purpose of providing the public with information.

But getting to those plans requires dedication, time and a working knowledge of federal bureaucracy. The plans are available only at the federal reading rooms (the EPA maintains one in Dallas, and the Department of Justice has rooms in Houston, Beaumont and San Antonio), and residents can view them in person only after calling ahead to make an appointment. Once the appointment is made, visitors must provide a driver's license to the security guard before being escorted into the locked reading room to receive instructions: in addition to the no-photo rule, notes must be taken on a pad of paper with a No. 2 pencil.

The EPA's original thinking, according to a summary in the federal register, was that "regulatory requirements by themselves will not guarantee safety, and that providing the public with information about hazards in a community can and should lead government officials and the public to work with industry to prevent accidents." But the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the bombing in 1998 of the World Trade Center, both using fertilizer, swung the pendulum from transparency toward security. The FBI worried that the worst-case scenario portions of the risk management plan would end up on the Internet, allowing would-be evil-doers to select U.S. facilities to sow mayhem. In August 1999, President Bill Clinton signed the Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act. It instructed the EPA and the Department of Justice to figure out a way to provide the public with access to the risk management plans in ways that would minimize the risk to national security. Federal officials eventually set up more than 70 reading rooms across the United States, where members of the public would have access - but only during normal business hours.

Critics say the security concerns have tilted the balance too far toward secrecy. In his firm's air pollution work, for instance, Austin environmental attorney David Frederick said he has had trouble getting information about local facilities to make an informed decision about whether neighbors might be exposed to air contaminants. "We've been told this is a homeland security issue. (State officials) say, 'This is dangerous. If evil people get it, they could make trouble.' "This was information once freely available," he added. "I'm suspicious about the security risk that, for all practical matters, makes the information inaccessible."

If you or someone you know have been seriously injured as a result of the fertilizer plant explosion in Waco, contact the attorneys at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Friend by calling 713-396-3964 or 1-800-594-4884.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.396.3964

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories