An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Recent Supreme Court Healthcare Decision

Today, the Supreme Court announced one of the most anticipated decisions in the past decade, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. This case challenged the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In a split decision of 5-4, the High Court struck down the Act's Medicaid expansion, but upheld its "Individual Mandate."

The decision written by Chief Justice Roberts laid out the progression of Medicaid since its enactment in the Social Security Act of 1965. The court declined to uphold the new provision, which would have expanded Medicaid by 40%. In order for the states to continue receiving their funding for Medicaid, the states would have been required to expand the rosters of Medicaid to include all individuals under the age of 65 who are under 133% percent of the poverty limit.

Chief Justice Roberts likened Congress increasing Medicaid while placing all of the states' Medicaid funding in jeopardy as a "gun to the head." The court refused to close the door to future expansions of Medicaid by allowing financial "encouragement," but not to the level in which Congress attempted in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The court upheld the "Individual Mandate" as within Congress's Tax Power. The "Individual Mandate" would require most Americans to purchase insurance or be assessed a "penalty" on their taxes.

The court identified the "penalty" that would be assessed to most individuals as a tax and refused to expand Congress's Commerce Clause Power to allow regulation of inactivity in the health care market as a viable reason for regulation. Chief Justice Roberts made it clear that he was not upholding the ability of Congress to demand that individuals purchase a product. He interpreted the "Individual Mandate" as a tax imposed on individuals who do not have insurance. The court upheld the remainder of the Act while excising the Medicaid expansion.

If you or someone you know has a healthcare claim, contact the attorneys at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Friend by calling 713-396-3964 or 1-800-594-4884.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Back to top