An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Supreme Court Ruling Endangers Open Beaches

Texans living along the Gulf Coast greeted with displeasure a recent ruling by a sharply divided Texas Supreme Court which compromises their right to open beaches. The case is named Severance v. Patterson, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2012).

The facts in Severance stemmed from Hurricane Rita's changes to the Texas coastline. Land "avulsed," leaving the beachfront further inland.

The underlying lawsuit was pending in federal court. But a federal appeals court sent a "certified question" to the Texas Supreme Court seeking a statement of whether, under Texas law, public access to the beach "rolled" inward along with the coastline. The Supreme Court, which has discretion to accept a certified question, took the case. It originally issued its ruling in November 2010. Afterwards, it granted a motion for rehearing. While that was pending, the landowner sold the property. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court determined to rule again on the case after the federal appeals court indicated that the matter was not rendered moot.

Texas passed the Open Beaches Act 1959. Owners of beachfront property are on notice that the coastline may change. Moreover, in 2009 Texas voters approved a state constitutional amendment protecting the right to "'state owned beach[es]'" (though the Court said that the amendment was irrelevant for the case).

Despite this, the Supreme Court ruled that the state's easement for access to the beach did not "roll" to "encumber . . . new parcels as a result of avulsive events." "Beachfront property lines retract or extend as previously dry lands become submerged or submerged lands become dry. Accordingly, public easements that burden these properties along the sea are also dynamic. . . . However, when a beachfront vegetation line is suddenly and dramatically pushed landward by acts of nature, an existing public easement on the public beach does not 'roll' inland to other parts of the parcel or onto a new parcel of land. Instead, when land and the attached easement are swallowed by the Gulf of Mexico in an avulsive event, a new easement must be established by sufficient proof to encumber the newly created dry beach bordering the ocean."

The Court's ruling is harmful to Texans who want to use their beaches, and threatens to create a "patchwork" system of beach access. It also hurts the City of Galveston's efforts to recover from storm damage. The Court's opinion was delivered by Justice Wainwright, in which Justices Hecht, Green, Johnson, and Willett joined. Justices Medina, Guzman, and Lehrmann dissented.

If you or someone you know has been involved in a property dispute, contact the attorneys at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Friend by calling 713-396-3964 or 1-800-594-4884.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Back to top