An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

United States v. Jones: The Supreme Court to Decide if Government Needs Warrant to Track a Suspect Using GPS

Photo of Benny Agosto

With the rapid advances in technology, it's no surprise that the law has been slow to address the possible reaches these new techniques and devices may have on individuals. However, with United States v. Jones currently pending before the Supreme Court, the law may be close to catching up.

The Jones case presents the Court with the opportunity to define an individual's expectation of privacy within the context of surveillance technology. Specifically, the Court will determine through the lens of the Fourth Amendment, whether the government can use GPS technology to track an individual's car without a warrant.

Traditionally, the Court has acknowledged an expectation of privacy inside the home when law enforcement seeks to monitor an individual. For example, the use of thermal imaging technology to measure heat emanating from a home requires law enforcement to have a warrant. However, when law enforcement monitoring occurs in the open, such as using beeper signals to track an individual's car, it has been less inclined to find the same expectation. The tracking of a car using GPS technology isn't as cut and dry-monitoring a car with GPS technology occurs outside the home, but the information constantly collected and analyzed isn't publicly accessible.

The Supreme Court isn't the only one wrestling with issues surrounding this new technology. Congress has proposed the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (EPCA) in response to the impact of new surveillance technology on privacy and electronic communications. The bill would impose more rigid warrant requirements on the government in order to intercept electronic communications in transit.

The Court's decision in the Jones case will answer how the Court will view the government's use of emerging surveillance technologies and data collection against individuals and businesses. The Supreme Court decision is expected in early 2012.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Back to top