An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Plaintiffs Challenge Statutory Damages Cap before Nebraska Supreme Court

The Nebraska Supreme Court will determine whether a $2.5 million verdict awarded to two young girls who were seriously injured in a sledding accident should be overturned. In December of 2000, Rachel and Chelsea Connelly were sledding down Memorial Park Hill when they violently collided into a crabapple tree planted by the city. Experts maintain that the hill's slope routed the girls into the crabapple tree.

The Connellys contend that the city was negligent because it was aware of the dangers posed by the crabapple trees, yet failed to take corrective action. To support this contention, the Connellys have shown that a city park planner was made aware of damage to the bottom of one newly planted tree before the accident. In addition, at trial, the Connellys presented a witness whose daughter suffered a broken jaw after hitting one of the newly planted trees days before the Connelly girls were injured. The city alleges that it should not be held liable for accidents during recreational activities. Deputy City Attorney Thomas Mumgaard wrote, "It is inexcusable negligence to put young children on an uncontrollable sled and send them down a hill near trees." Mumgaard also faults Chelsea in the accident, saying that she was an experienced sledder, and failed to fall off the sled or drag her feet to prevent the sled from colliding with the tree.

Rachel was awarded a statutory maximum of $1 million, but her medical bills are expected to reach $4.2 million. As a result the Connelly's have challenged the constitutionality of the limiting statute, arguing that it deprives Rachel of her substantive due process right to recover proven economic damages.
The Nebraska Supreme Court will hear oral arguments beginning on September 7.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top