An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Appeals Court Rules Against Widow and Children

In a recent decision, the court of appeals in Dallas ruled that a widow and her children had no legal remedy after her husband was killed while servicing a convenience store.

In the case of Gorman v. Ngo, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex.App.-Dallas 2011, no pet.), Ngo owned a convenience store. After he had a walk-in cooler installed, customers and the lessee of the store complained that they were being shocked. Gorman was called to investigate. He determined that the cooler door was energized, so he cut the power and then began checking the condenser outside of the store. When opening the condenser cover, he was fatally electrocuted. It turned out that the installation of the walk-in cooler violated the electrical code because it was not grounded. Testimony indicated that it was impossible to know by looking at the condenser that the cover was energized, and that it is common to leave the power on when attempting to trouble-shoot a problem. Nevertheless, applying the controversial Ch. 95 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code (which Ngo had not raised with the trial judge), the court of appeals ruled that Gorman was killed by "the condition or use of an improvement to real property" even though he did not "construct[], repair[], renovate[], or modif[y] the improvement," as the statute requires.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top