An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Arbitration Under Fire by Billionaire

Photo of Randy Sorrels

Lawyers, including myself, have long complained of the unfairness of the mandatory arbitration process. Touted by many businesses as a better alternative to be jury trial process, those who oppose the mandatory arbitration system generally have a long list of inequities to parade as exhibits to support their arguments. Now, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen and his investment company, Vulcan Capital, are jumping on the bandwagon to criticize the mandatory arbitration process. The little guys -- usually a credit card consumer or the mammoth sized company employee -- are ready to applaud the billionaire's decision to remove mandatory arbitration agreements from his Vulcan employee contracts.

It is reported that in legal filings made in King County Superior Court in Seattle, Washington, Vulcan is requesting the trial court to set aside an arbitration ruling in favor of two former Vulcan employees. The Allen company and the two employees were compelled to arbitration in their employment dispute. Vulcan alleges one of the three arbitrators improperly met with the two employees and their lawyer for five hours prior to hearing and deciding the arbitration. They further alleged the meetings, or as they call them "consultations", were not disclosed by the arbitrator before the proceedings or at any time before the evidence was presented and the award was issued. Vulcan argues this fact alone independently justifies the invalidation of the arbitration award. Whether this fact indeed justifies the invalidation of the arbitration award, one thing is clear -- the United States system of justice would not tolerate these type of "closed-door" meetings prior to important dispute being resolved.

This case represents another example of why the often secretive mandatory arbitration approach is substantially inferior to the open courts system fought for by our founding fathers. Our democracy will be better served by an open courts system, and our legislators should re-examine the role of mandatory arbitration in our country.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Back to top