An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Intermediate Court Requires Manufacturer To Provide Design Information

In a recent ruling from the Court of Appeals in Corpus Christi, an appellate court has determined that the party suing a manufacturer of a riding lawn mower can learn about the manufacturer's efforts to reduce the risk of a rollover on other machines.

On his first day on the job, Rodolfo Castillo was permanently paralyzed by a lawn mower made by Exmark Manufacturing Co., Inc. when it rolled over. The worker sued the maker because it did not provide rollover protection. During the course of the suit, Castillo's lawyer sought to obtain information from the maker concerning the design of this and similar products. Using a tactic that other manufacturers have used in products liability cases, Exmark refused to provide the information, claiming that it would only provide information about the specific product in question.

In the opinion of In re Exmark Manufacturing Co, Inc. handed down on November 3, 2009, the court of appeals ruled that Exmark would have to provide the information. The court ruled that Exmark had failed to produce any evidence to satisfy its burden to prove that the scope of the request for information was overly broad. Additionally, since the law requires a plaintiff who brings a products liability suit to prove that there was a "safer alternative design," it is appropriate to obtain information about what other designs the product maker actually uses. The products do not have to be identical, as long as they are similar.

The court concluded this case - which is a victory for those trying to hold manufacturers responsible for their dangerous products - by quoting an earlier ruling: "Only in certain narrow circumstances is it appropriate to obstruct the search for truth by denying discovery."

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top