An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Fifth Circuit Opinion Allows Climate Change Lawsuit

Private plaintiffs have begun filing suit for damages alleged to have been caused by climate changes. Whether these cases, involving energy and chemical company defendants, will stand remains an open question. On October 16, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the dismissal of a climate change lawsuit brought by residents and owners of lands and property along the Mississippi Gulf Coast who claim damages from Hurricane Katrina. No. 07-60756; Comer v. Murphy Oil, et al. These Plaintiffs sued numerous energy companies, chemical companies, and coal mining companies based upon the claim that the Defendants' operation of the energy, chemical, and fossil fuels industries in the United States caused the emission of greenhouse gases that have contributed to global warming. The Comer Plaintiffs claim that the increase in global surface, air and water temperatures caused a rise in sea levels and added to the impact of Hurricane Katrina, which combined to destroy the Plaintiffs' private property, as well as public property useful to them.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi dismissed the Comer lawsuit on September 17, 2007, based upon lack of standing and also based upon the political question doctrine. This was consistent with other federal district courts in recent years, all of whom have dismissed private party climate change lawsuits based upon lack of standing and/or the political question doctrine. As recently as September 30, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a climate change lawsuit filed by an Alaskan Inupiat village against twenty-four oil, energy and utility companies based upon these same defenses. No. C 08-1138; Native Village of Kivalina, et al. v. ExxonMobil Corporation, et al.

However, the Fifth Circuit held that the private party Plaintiffs in Comer have standing to assert public and private nuisance, trespass, and negligence claims based upon their allegations of global warming. The Fifth Circuit also held that none of these claims present nonjusticiable political questions which must be dismissed based upon the political question doctrine. Thus, the Fifth Circuit reversed the dismissal of Plaintiffs' nuisance, trespass, and negligence claims and remanded them to the district court.

The Comer decision follows on the heels of the September 21, 2009, Second Circuit decision in State of Connecticut, et al. v. American Electric Power Company, et al. which reversed the dismissal of a climate change lawsuit filed by eight states and the City of New York against six electric power companies that own and operate fossil-fuel power plants in twenty states. The Second Circuit held that the Plaintiffs had stated claims under the federal common law of nuisance which did not present non-justiciable political questions and that those Plaintiffs had standing to bring their claims.

Thus, the Fifth and Second Circuits have held that certain private parties may bring nuisance, trespass, or negligence lawsuits based upon the claim that the actions of certain identified defendants have contributed to global warming, and that such claims are not barred by the political question doctrine. Courts have begun warming up to the view that certain private party plaintiffs can sue for damages allegedly caused by global warming.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top