An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Texas Supreme Court Alters Long-Standing Rule

This month, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in favor of defendants by altering a long-standing court rule. The case was In re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, and it was decided on July 3, 2009.

In this suit, a man entered a hospital with kidney stones and died two days later. After a four-week trial, the jury returned a verdict for the hospital and nurses. However, the judge who presided over the trial granted a new trial "in the interest of justice and fairness," as the rules of court have permitted for many decades. The defense filed a certain kind of appeal known as a "mandamus" to force the judge to enter judgment for the defense or to state his reasons for a new trial. No Texas law required that. Later, a new judge was elected to that trial court, and as a result the mandamus was abated so that the new trial judge could consider the order granting a new trial. He also agreed with it.

Overturning years of court decisions, including some from the Supreme Court itself, the Court granted the mandamus and sent the case back to the trial court, directing the new judge to state the reasons for a new trial. The Supreme Court based its reasoning in part upon the importance of the right to a trial by jury, even though it has ruled repeatedly in the last several years in favor of arbitration over the right to a trial by jury.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top