Insurance Companies & Advertising: Shouldn't your word be your bond?

I think we have all seen the commercials and read the magazine advertisements created by the insurance companies. Some insurance companies take a cost approach to their marketing and stress the savings that can be had by the average consumer. For example, Geico markets to the public by representing that you can save lots of money by switching to one of their policies. Other insurance companies, often the ones that charge higher premiums and have been around much longer, market to the public with a message like "you're in good hands" or "like a good neighbor, we will be there." Seemingly, these companies are seeking to differentiate themselves by advertising their insurance as superior, albeit for a higher premium.

State Farm even ran the famous "Something is Missing" campaign where they ran an entire series of advertisements aimed at the deceptive practices that "other" insurance companies commit. For example, State Farm has a commercial where they show a hot dog vendor advertising hot dogs on the street. One customer approaches and purchases a hot dog from the vendor. The vendor then turns and provides him with a wiener, but no bun. The customer is upset and asks for the bun, but the vendor merely replies, "Where did I say anything about the bun?" Shocked, the customer replies that it is not really a hot dog without the bun. The commercial fades out and reads, "Is your insurance company selling you a hot dog without the bun? Find out. State Farm." State Farm ran a whole host of similar ads regarding car washes, foot massages, and shoe shines. In each ad, the customer was not getting what they bargained for. In each ad, State Farm represented that it does not conduct its business in that manner.

Is State Farm suggesting that the "other" insurers, who rely on complicated fine print and legalese to escape coverage, are in the wrong? I would certainly agree with that contention, but is that what State Farm is saying? Does this mean that State Farm is no longer going to be relying on, or pointing to, fine print to escape its obligations to provide insurance? It seems that State Farm has embraced the reasonable expectations doctrine with regards to insurance policies. Under this approach, the fine print matters less than what the reasonable person would expect to receive from the insurance company. Indeed, under the reasonable expectations doctrine, the insurance policy will be interpreted to meet the reasonable expectations of the insured, even if the actual language of the policy said otherwise.

I have represented several people and business that have been given the "see the fine print" argument by their insurance companies. However, it was not State Farm in those instances. What will be interesting to see is whether the courts will hold these insurance companies to their word. For example, will State Farm be able to escape coverage by relying on the fine print or a technical exclusion, after they have represented to the public that they do not employ such practices? It seems that the courts should hold them, and similar advertising insurance companies, to their word, given that the insurance company thought the ad campaign would serve to get them more business. In other words, there are people who switched insurance or purchased insurance from State Farm based on such advertisements. State Farm would not run such a campaign if it was not intended to increase its insurance contracts. Shouldn't State Farm then be held to its word? Indeed, State Farm is advertising to the public what they should be expecting from their insurance company.

What is even more interesting is that State Farm is setting the tone for all the insurance companies. At the very least, State Farm is calling those other companies out. If State Farm, an insurance company designed to collect premiums and maximize profits, can call those other insurance companies "shady," then shouldn't we? Shouldn't we demand that ALL insurers mean what they say, and say what they mean? Shouldn't your word be your bond?

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories