Stanford Update

1. United States District Judge Godbey last week established the briefing schedule for arguments on whether Allen Stanford should be able to obtain money to pay his attorneys. John Little-the court-appointed Examiner representing the interests of CD investors-has been given until today (May 4) to file his response. Since the Court denied the proposed interventions of the CD investors two weeks ago, they do not have the right to respond. Allen Stanford's attorneys have been given until May 8 to reply. Allen Stanford has also filed an appeal with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to lift the Order freezing his assets, and Judge Godbey has questioned whether he has authority to amend that Order while it is being appealed. There is no date set to decide that issue.

2. A similar briefing process applies to the motion of the Antiguan Receiver seeking to place Stanford International Bank into bankruptcy, and the date has been extended to May 15, 2009. Judge Godbey earlier in this case ordered that only the Receiver could place Stanford in bankruptcy. The briefing issues relate only to whether the judge has to amend his Order to recognize the Antiguan receiver's efforts, and not to the central issues in any SIB bankruptcy.

3. The Receiver's Interim Report filed two weeks ago contained one story that explains why SIB is unlikely to have significant cash or assets to repay CD investors. According to the report, SIB bought 1,587 acres of undeveloped land in Antigua for $63.5 million in April 2008 and immediately sold it to Allen Stanford for that price. He placed the land in a company he controlled and then set the land value at $3.2 billion, a 50-fold increase, with no justification. He then transferred some of the shares in the land company to SIB, and SIB forgave a $1.7 billion loan to Allen Stanford. In other words, Allen Stanford had taken $1.7 billion in cash from SIB (presumably funded by CD purchases) and repaid the loan with highly overvalued land. This suggests that, by early 2008, SIB lacked sufficient collateral to support the CD program since Allen Stanford had used the program as a personal "piggy bank." We hope that evidence like this will cause Judge Godbey to deny Stanford's request for money to pay attorneys.

4. Allen Stanford staged an attempt to surrender to authorities. He and his attorney pulled a publicity stunt last week by offering to surrender at the federal courthouse in Houston. Presumably, the move is intended to support an argument that he is willing to be available for any criminal proceedings in order to keep the amount of any bail set for him in the future low; this also may be an attempt to bring pressure on prosecutors to move forward.

5. The Stanford Victims Coalition is asking Congress to modify SIPC rules to allow compensation for CD investors. The argument being made is that investors purchased the CDs in the United States through an SIPC member, Stanford Financial Group, so the United States regulatory agencies should have uncovered the fraud. The argument admits that current SIPC regulations do not provide compensation, but argues that the rules should cover situations like this. There are no significant reports on the progress of this effort.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories