Stanford Update: March 30, 2009

Activity in the SEC's federal suit in Dallas picked up last week. The Receiver filed a motion to obtain court approval for implementing a process whereby Stanford investors with brokerage accounts that remain frozen may submit information to the Receiver seeking the release of those funds. The process will apply to the approximately 4,000 brokerage accounts held by Pershing and JP Morgan Chase which are still frozen because the account holder has ties to CDs at Stanford International Bank (SIB) in Antigua. The Receiver estimates that these accounts have $1.7 billion.

The Court will grant the Receiver's motion in the near future because it is unopposed. Significantly, by submitting a form requesting release of funds, each account holder will agree that the Court in Dallas is the proper jurisdiction for all disputes related to the accounts. Also, the investor agrees to pay back any funds later found to be the proceeds of fraudulent activity. The application form to release the accounts will be posted on the Receiver's web site in coming days, but a copy is located here:

It has been reported that the form will require you to waive any claims against the Receiver, but this requirement is not found in the form accessed by the above link. This appears to be a legitimate effort to limit the frozen accounts to assets that are expressly linked to the SIB CDs, but we will review the actual form as soon as it is posted.

The Court has not ruled on the objections by the SEC and Receiver to the interventions, and to the ancillary litigation in other jurisdictions. Like other lawyers representing intervenors, we filed a reply to their objections last week. The Receiver also objected to a motion filed by several former Stanford brokers requesting that an Examiner be appointed to represent the interests of former Stanford customers. The Court has not yet made clear when the pending motions, interventions, and objections will be heard. Many intervenors continue to withdraw their interventions now that the Receiver has released their brokerage accounts.

The United States Receiver (Janvey) and the Antiguan Receiver (Vantis) are wrangling over who has jurisdiction over the Stanford assets located in Antigua. To the extent the United States Receiver (Janvey) loses this argument, he will have fewer assets available to distribute to Stanford customers in the United States. The Antiguan Receiver has already stated that he believes that there will be "a significant shortfall of assets." 

The Fox Business Network sued the SEC for failing to respond to an expedited request for information under the Freedom of Information Act. Fox asked for government records "regarding the SEC's past and current receipt of, and response to complaints, tips, or other information regarding potential violations of the securities laws or any other wrongdoing by R. Allen Stanford, Stanford Financial Group, and/or any of its affiliates...." It will be interesting to see what information is revealed when those documents are ultimately produced.

Finally, Allen Stanford is still seeking legal representation, and has reportedly been in discussions with Dick DeGuerin, a prominent Houston criminal defense attorney for representation. Additionally, Laura Pendergest-Holt has apparently filed a claim against her prior counsel.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories