An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Supreme Court Rules Against Deceased Worker's Family

In the case of In re Union Carbide Corporation, an opinion released on January 9, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court ruled against the survivors of a worker who died from industrial toxic exposure.

Initially, a fellow worker named Kenneth Moffett brought suit for personal injuries because he contracted myelogenous leukemia from toxic exposure at Union Carbide's Texas City plant. Later, the family of John Hall intervened in that lawsuit because John Hall had worked at the same plant and had contracted myelodysplastic syndrome from toxic chemicals.

Union Carbide objected to the intervention by John Hall's family, so the trial judge severed that claim and treated it as a separate lawsuit. Union Carbide appealed anyway, and the Texas Supreme Court - which is said to be far behind in its case load - accepted the case.

The Supreme Court ruled that the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which permit interventions in some situations, does not permit one here. Further, even if the law suits of Moffett and the Halls might be properly handled together under rules related to joining cases (called "joinder"), the Supreme Court ruled that the rules related to joinder should not be considered. So, the Supreme Court ruled the trial judge was wrong to sever the case. Instead, according to the Supreme Court, the trial court should have dismissed the case. Under that ruling, the family of John Hall would have to start all over with the lawsuit, even though their claim was severed at the very beginning and put in its own suit.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top