An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Supreme Court Reverses a Jury Verdict, Again

On December 5, 2008, the Supreme Court of Texas again reversed a jury verdict. In the case of Texas Department of Transportation v. York, the Supreme Court ruled that an unexpected loose layer of gravel is not a "special defect."

Rebecca York was traveling on FM 979 on October 29, 2003. She lost control of her vehicle in a part of the roadway where - the day before - TxDOT had applied a layer of gravel to the surface. When it hit the gravel, Ms. York's vehicle lost control, went across the centerline, and was struck by a truck. She died at the scene. A jury ruled that TxDOT was negligent and awarded her family $1,033,440. The trial judge cut that figure down to $250,000, because the statute puts the results of the State's negligence on the victim to the extent that the damages exceed $250,000. In other words, a state agency does not have to bear responsibility for the portion of the damages caused by its negligence above $250,000. Despite this, TxDOT appealed. The court of appeals agreed with the trial court that the gravel in the roadway was a "special defect."

The Supreme Court - in an unsigned ruling called a "per curium opinion" - said that the slippery gravel was not an "unexpected and unusual danger" to ordinary users of the roadway. The Court said that it was not similar to the danger presented by excavations or obstructions in the roadway, which are two conditions listed merely as examples in the statute. Because it reversed the decisions of the jury, the trial judge, and the court of appeals, the Supreme Court ruled that the case had to be tried all over again. This time, the standard which the York family will have to prove is much more difficult, so TxDOT may escape responsibility altogether. The family will have to prove that TxDOT not only knew of the condition it created, but further that it knew the condition posed an "unreasonable risk of harm." Naturally, it is unusual that any agency will admit that it had such knowledge. So, it is now unexpected that the family will receive any compensation whatsoever.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Back to top