Lady Justice is Blind

Recently, I went down to the Harris County District Court and watched three of the lawyers at the firm finish trying a lawsuit. I was able to make it down to watch closing arguments. The case involved a worker who had been killed on the job after a terrible incident involving a large truck. Without going into the details of the incident, this was a wrongful death lawsuit. The evidence clearly showed that it could have been prevented if the defendant had simply followed its own rules. This particular worker was from another country and was working in the United States with the hopes of a better life for his family and himself. He had lost his life in pursuit of that dream.

During closing arguments, defense counsel for the employer made many remarks regarding our client's country of origin. He was clearly trying to let the jury know that our client was not "one of us." He arguably had legal justification for some of his statements, but others were basically implying to the jury that they should not compensate the family of the deceased worker with much money for the child's loss of a father and the wife's loss of a husband because the deceased worker "was not from around here." He further tried to argue to the jury that any compensation for pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of consortium, or loss of household services would be arbitrary and speculative.

Although defense counsel fully knows that these elements of damage are legally compensable and were warranted in the case, he tried to play on the jury's prejudices against immigrants and against non-economic damages. Defense counsel's argument was essentially this, "Since we don't have any evidence that we can see regarding the pain and suffering, mental anguish, etc., such as a bill or an invoice, any amount awarded for those damage elements will be based on a guess, will be arbitrary, and will be speculative." His argument, if followed by other courts and juries, would essentially destroy non-economic damages in their entirety, as these types of damages never have an invoice or a bill. That is why they are called non-economic damages. However, defense counsel was playing on the prejudices of the jury against lawsuits and personal injury awards.

The attorneys at my firm then responded that Lady Justice is blind. One of the attorneys explained that we have all seen Lady Justice. She is at the courthouse. She holds the scales of justice and stands for the proposition that evidence will be weighed and judged accordingly. He further explained that she is also blindfolded. Why? The reason is that under the law, justice is supposed to be blind. Justice should be blind to your ethnicity, race, nationality, gender, age, appearance, and anything else. To have justice, you must have it applied equally. Justice applies to immigrant workers just as is does to anybody else. Indeed, this is the foundation of the rule of law.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories