An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Supreme Court Ruling Favors Bars

The Texas Supreme Court issued a ruling on March 28, 2008 which helps bars avoid liability. In the case of 20801, Inc. v. Parker, 249 S.W.3d 392 (Tex. 2008), the Supreme Court reduced the elements a bar must prove when an injury is caused by a person to whom it serves too many drinks.

Under a statute passed by the Legislature, a bar is liable if it "over serves" an intoxicated person which leads to injury or death. But, the Legislature also created a "safe harbor" defense that gives the bar complete protection in most cases. To qualify for the defense, the bar must provide its waiters with an approved safety course, they must take the course, and the bar must not directly or indirectly encourage its staff to over serve.

For virtually every other defense in law, the defendant-here, the bar-bears the burden to prove its defense by a preponderance of the evidence. But in 20801, Inc., the Supreme Court reversed the burden of proof for one of the elements of the safe harbor defense. Now, the Supreme Court has eliminated the bar's burden to show that it did not encourage its staff to over serve patrons. The Supreme Court further added to the burden of the plaintiff-the injured person or family of the deceased-to prove that the bar's management encouraged over serving of the intoxicated person. In other words, by switching the burden of proof for that element of the safe harbor defense from the defendant to the plaintiff, the Supreme Court has made it easier for the bar to avoid liability, and has made it harder for victims to obtain justice under the statute. Finally, the defendant "is not required to demonstrate enforcement on the occasion" in question, meaning that the bar is not required to show that it enforced a policy of complying with the law on the night of the tragedy.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top