The New And Improved Supreme Court -- Or Is It More Of The Same?

The recent American Bar Association Journal (Oct. 2008) has on its cover a banner headlining its October edition as well as a feature article within, which reads, "Supreme Court 2.0, New! Improved! Remaking the High Court". At first blush, one can only hope that its author contemplates manners, means and techniques, maybe even ideas which may make the U.S. Supreme Court a court that would resemble its constituents, the lawyers of this great land, or simply the millions of men and women of the United States. Can it be possible that despite the ABA's efforts to promote judicial diversity, specifically that of the members of the Court, that not a word was written for the inclusion of a Latino(a) as a means to reform and re-engineer the top bench?

For more than 200 years the Supreme Court has decided cases, issues, policies, and disputes without the input or mental impressions of a Latino(a) Justice. Can it be so that many qualified Latino(a) judicial candidates who serve as Judges from Federal Circuit Courts to trial courts all over the country, continue to be overlooked? This is exactly the case in the recent ABA Journal article. However, this will not be the case for very much longer.

Commentators across the country who study the U.S. Supreme Court forecast that two to three Justices' seats will become available for new members of the Court during the next four years. For eight years, President Bush has wavered about the idea of a Latino(a) candidate with the dream of becoming the first ever Latino(a) Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court. Much talk, but no action. The time for action is now! The time has come to finally make judicial history.

The 2000 Census reveals that Hispanics comprise more than 12.5% of the total United States population, or almost 35 million people. In light of the demographics, one should expect, or even demand, to see a Latino(a) on the Supreme Court. See generally, Kevin Johnson, On the Appointment of a Latina/o to the Supreme Court, 1 Hisp. Nat'l B. Ass'n J.L. & Pol'y 20 (2008). Just as Justice Thurgood Marshall's historic appointment in 1967 did for African-Americans, a Latino(a) appointment would bring new and much needed perspectives to the U.S. Supreme Court. Without question, the addition of a Latino(a) to the High Court holds the promise of improving the decision-making process on constitutional law, civil rights, and various other matters. Id. For that matter, in order to have a new and improved U.S. Supreme Court, any change must include a Latino(a) Justice on the Court. Any change less than that, will be simply more of the same old rhetoric.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories