Blog

"Jury Duty from a Trial Lawyer's Perspective"

Two weeks ago I had to go to jury duty. I was probably the only person in the entire assembly excited about the idea of being on a jury. You could hear grumblings across the room. "I can't believe I had to take off work to be here." "We only get $6.00 for today - that barely covers my parking." The crowd as a whole was not pleased to be there. However, everyone sat patiently waiting for instructions from the television screens scattered around the room. Since I knew how the long the process takes, I was prepared. I brought a newspaper as well as another book to read.

One of the first things which confused me was the fact the instructions to potential jurors were in English, Spanish and then Vietnamese. If you have to understand the English language to sit on a jury, then why do we need instructions in 3 different languages? The next thing that bothered me was the vending machines. A Coke was $1.50 and a bag of chips $1.25. I understand that the cost of groceries has gone up, but shouldn't the county give the citizens a break when it comes to one of the few pleasures available while waiting for your fate as a juror. The very least they can do it make them under a dollar. A know it's a petty complaint, but when you only have $6.00 for the day, you hate to spend 1/4 of it on one drink.

As the screens started to display juror numbers to let you know you've been assigned to a panel, my heart actually started to beat a little harder. Maybe this will the time that I finally get to sit on a jury and see what it's like to deliberate. Usually I'm sitting in the courtroom with clients trying to guess what's going on back in that secret little room. They finally approached my juror number, and then they skipped me. What? How could this be happening? Do they know I'm a trial lawyer? Is it something I put on my juror information sheet? The truth is, I don't know why they skipped me along with 40 other people. As the hour went past, the jury assembly room was nearly empty. Less than 50 people still remained. I was one of them. Finally, my number flashed across the screen and I had been assigned to a jury panel. I was on my way to Civil County Court at Law number 3.

As the bailiff lined us up, I told the guy next to me that we were likely headed to a car wreck trial. Guess what, I was right. Of the 18 people assigned to the panel, I was number 15. Knowing that each lawyer would get 3 strikes, unless the attorneys were able to strike 3 people ahead of me for cause (for being to biased to sit on the jury) then there was no chance I was getting selected on this jury. As we approached the courtroom, the bailiff lined us up in numerical order. It was like being in elementary school again preparing for a fire drill. We were then escorted into the courtroom. It was interesting to have everyone stand as we entered the room. A sign of respect for the potential jurors as well as the process. As I looked around the room, I realized that I recognized several people. Do I say something? Do I wait to be asked? I decided to just sit back and be quiet. I'll wait for the judge's instructions.

The judge proceeded to give a short, yet convoluted explanation about the purpose of voir dire. I don't think anyone on the panel knew what she was talking about. She then explained that each attorney would get 10 minutes to question the panel. 10 MINUTES! ARE YOU KIDDING? As a trial lawyer I was shocked to hear this. How can anyone conduct an effective voir dire in 10 minutes? You can barely find out the name of someone's spouse in 10 minutes. Much less find out if they can award damages for injuries you client has suffered. Hearing this, I've decided not to file any more cases in county court. After each lawyer used their 10 minutes, I knew that there was no way I could be on this panel. There was no one who could arguably be struck for cause. Another trip for jury service, and another day without sitting on a jury.

As I left the courthouse and proceeded back to work, I was pleased that I was a part of the process. However, I definitely believe potential jurors should be more informed on how the process works. Without knowing the intricacies from being on the other side of the bar, you merely feel that you are a sheep in a giant heard not sure if you're headed to the slaughter house. At the end of the day, I was impressed with the attitudes of the rest of the potential jurors. Although and inconvenience for many, by the end of the day, I think most understood the importance of participating in the process. The greatest process in the world.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Awards & Recognition

  • 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

    The Equal Access to Justice Champions Program was started by the Houston Bar Association in 2006, to help ensure placement of Houston Volunteer Lawyers cases with pro bono volunteers. Originally, firms were tiered according to size, and firms within each tier committed to accept a certain number of pro bono cases from HVL each year for five years.

  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers

    The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.

  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Established in 1993, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (which includes the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum) is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. There are over 4000 members throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members.

  • Recognized by Best Lawyers America | Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz | 2017

    Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

  • Lead Counsel Rated

    In order to earn the Lead Counsel Rating, an attorney must not only demonstrate significant legal experience, but must also receive multiple peer recommendations advocating his or her ability. This is a key component in the screening process.

  • Texas Super Lawyers | Texas Monthly

    Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the top lawyers in Texas via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. The Texas lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Texas Super Lawyers Top Lists.

Get Your Free Case Review 713.587.9668

Let Us Help You Today! Request a Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Personal Injury Large Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs', taking a lead role in the plaintiffs' steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Personal Injury Plant Fire and Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs' steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Personal Injury Work Site Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm's client.

  • $12 Million Auto Accident 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $30 Million Personal Injury Burn Victims

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $30 million.

Our Record Of Success.

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

More Success Stories