An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

High Court to Rule upon Key Issue

The Texas Supreme Court set oral arguments for December 11, 2008 in a case that is very important to the families of those injured and killed in Texas, including current clients of Abraham, Watkins. The case is Galbraith Engineering Consultants Inc. v. Sam Pochucha and Jean Pochucha. At issue is the limit of the practice by defendants of designating "responsible third parties."

When someone ("the plaintiff") damaged by the negligence of another ("the defendant") sues him, the defendant often wants to point the finger of fault at a third party ("third party"). In times past, the defendant was required to sue the third party, and serve the lawsuit papers upon him, if the defendant wanted to blame the third party. In some instances, that raised problems because the third party might be a company which was bankrupt or out of business. This law was changed to favor defendants; now, the law only requires the defendant to name ("designate") a third party; if the third party is unavailable or bankrupt, that works to the detriment of the plaintiff, not the defendant.

Sometimes the defendant designates a third party after the statute of limitations would bar the plaintiff from suing the third party. In that event, current law gives the plaintiff 60 days to add the third party to the suit, even if the statute of limitations would have barred the plaintiff from suing the third party.

Statues of "repose" are like the statutes of limitations, except they bar any action against some parties 10 years after a building was constructed or a product was made, regardless of when the injury occurred. So, a claim might be barred even before the plaintiff is injured, and the plaintiff could never hold that party responsible for his negligence.

What happens if a defendant tries to designate as a third party the maker of a building after the 10-year limit? If the plaintiff is not allowed to add the third party to the suit, then the defendant may obtain an offset in the verdict against the third party even though the plaintiff could not bring suit against that third party. The Supreme Court will answer this question when it rules in the Galbraith Engineering case.

Since oral arguments are set for December, we can look for a ruling sometime next year.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Back to top