An Update from Our Firm about COVID-19

Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner remains fully operational and committed to serving our clients and colleagues throughout the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. As we follow the CDC guidelines and practice social distancing, we remain available for phone consultations and scheduled in-person meetings with both current and prospective clients and colleagues. Please contact our office by email or by calling 713-222-7211 with any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

C.P.R.C. Section 18.091(a) Does Not Apply to Personal Injury Cases

I recently wrote this paper on Section 18.091(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code because defense attorneys kept trying to force plaintiffs to bring an accountant to trial to testify regarding how much their lost wages would be after taxes. It has been a long standing principle that those injured by another party's negligence should be fully compensated. In recent years, tort feasors have tried to limit their responsibility for their negligent actions. One attempt was to enact Section 18.091(a). However, the defense bar's interpretation of this section clearly conflicts with federal law.

In 2003, the Texas Legislature enacted Section 18.091(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code as part of sweeping tort reform. The statute reads as follows:

"Notwithstanding any other law, if any claimant seeks recovery for loss of earnings, loss of earning capacity, loss of contributions of a pecuniary value, or loss of inheritance, evidence to prove the loss must be presented in the form of a net loss after reduction for income tax payments or unpaid tax liability pursuant to any federal income tax law. Id. (emphasis added)."

Since the enactment of this section, defense attorneys have attempted to use this as a tool in their fight to lower the amount of damages that injured plaintiffs can recover. After a detailed look at the statute and the relevant federal law, it became apparent to me that this section does not apply to claims for personal injury or sickness. Since then, our firm has been able to convince members of the judiciary that section does not affect a plaintiff's claim for personal injuries.

The reason Section 18.091(a) of the C.P.R.C. is inapplicable is quite simple. Both the IRS and the United States Supreme Court have excluded damages on account of physical injury or sickness from gross income. As are result, damages in a personal injury case can not be presented in a net tax form.

Specifically, Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code excludes from gross income the amount of any damages (other than punitive damages) received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness. The United States Supreme Court has confirmed that damages for lost wages and/or loss of future earnings as a result of personal physical injuries, such as a car wreck, are not included in gross income and not taxable. Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323, 329-330. Because the damages Plaintiff seeks in this case are on account of personal physical injuries they are not included in gross income and not subject to taxation. Therefore, Section 18.091(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code is inapplicable.

Full text of the article.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • $50+ Million Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented nearly 100 victims who suffered personal injuries and damages to property from a large fire and explosion resulting in a settlement of more than $50 million. The firm served as lead lawyers on the steering committee in this litigation.

  • $80 Million Plant Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 270 plaintiffs, taking a lead role in the plaintiffs’ steering committee, who suffered injuries in a large plant explosion resulting in a settlement of nearly $80 million.

  • $50+ Million Plant Fire & Explosion

    The firm successfully represented 45 personal injury victims in a plant fire and explosion, serving on the plaintiffs steering committee, concluding with a settlement of more than $50 million.

  • $22+ Million Worksite Accident

    The firm prevailed in a personal injury trial for a worksite injury client with the jury returning a verdict and resulting in a judgment of over $22 million for the firm’s client.

  • $12 Million 18-Wheeler Collision

    The firm successfully achieved a $12 million settlement for the family of a man who died in an 18 wheeler collision.

  • $48 Million Catastrophic Burns

    The firm prevailed on behalf of three burn victims with settlements totaling nearly $48 million.

Our Record Of Success

When you are hurt and you choose a law firm to represent you in court or at the negotiation table, you need to carefully consider the firm's record.

Read More Success Stories

Let Us Help You Request a Free Consultation Today

Get Help Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Back to top