En EspaƱol Get Your Free Case Review Today! Main Menu
713-587-9668
In Houston
800-580-9121
Toll Free

Supreme Court Rules Against Texas Consumers

Photo of Jay Jackson

The Texas Supreme Court recently ruled against Texas consumers of electricity. The case was Texas Industrial Energy Consumers v. CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, ___ S.W.3d ___, (Tex. 2010), and the opinion was handed down on October 22, 2010.
During the deregulation of electricity, Reliant Energy was divided into an electrical generation company, a retail provider, and CenterPoint, a transmission and distribution company. Electrical providers were allowed to recovery certain "stranded" costs including interest, as well as the costs of a "valuation panel" incurred when presenting the claim. Here, over the objection of consumers' groups, the Supreme Court affirmed a ruling for CenterPoint by the Public Utility Commission. That ruling allows CenterPoint to recover - and pass along to consumers - an imputed interest rate in excess of 11%. In addition, it will also be allowed to pass to consumers the costs of the experts it hired for its valuation panel, which exceed $5,000,000.
"The consumer groups argue that interest . . . is not allowed because we invalidated Rule 25.263(l)(3) in its entirety in [an earlier opinion]. The PUC and CenterPoint argue that we only invalidated the timing portion of the Rule - the date that interest begins to accrue. We agree with the PUC and CenterPoint."
The Court approved the costs of the valuation panel, approved by the PUC. "[T]he PUC, whose reasonable construction of PURA merits 'serious consideration,' [has] the better argument: '[B]y providing that the transferee corporations 'shall pay' valuation panel expenses, the legislature did not intend to preclude those expenses ultimately being recovered through rates under PURA 36.061(b)(2). [Section 39.262(h)(3)]. . . . It is true, as TIEC contends, that state-agency powers are limited, and agencies may not 'on a theory of necessary implication from a specific power, function, or duty expressly delegated, erect and exercise what really amounts to a new and additional power or one that contradicts the statute, no matter that the new power is viewed as expedient for administrative purposes.' But that admonition is inapposite here.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Us Today
And Get Your Free Case Review

Logo: Texas Best Lawyers Logo: Texas Super Lawyers - Texas Bar College Logo: Lead Counsel Rated Logo: Houston's Top Lawyers Logo: American Trial Lawyers Association
Logo: Abraham Watkins Best Lawyers in America Best Lawyers Award Badge Logo: American Board of Trial Advocates - Million Dollar Advocates Forum Logo: The Best Lawyers in America Logo: 2016-2017 Equal Access to Justice Champion

As Seen On:

Logo: CNN Logo: Houston Chronicle Logo: Houston Public Media Logo: ABC 13 Logo: USA Today Logo: KHOU 11 Logo: KPRC 2 Logo: Fox 26 Logo: Telemundo Logo: Univision